Comments on: Urlacher for Boldin: Not Happening

By: terrill

terrill — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:23:17 +0000

lets face it friends, the bears need alot of work. to adam who wrote a comment above me i say there was the portis for bailey deal that worked for both teams. so its not like this kind of deal couldn’t happen. but urlacher is still the FACE of the franchise. if you did get trade him for boldin then you have a vacancy at ILB and no draft picks for 2-3 yrs. instead of boldin get TJ from the bengals. a similiar type of wide out and you don’t shed good talent from the team. its all about the mccheapskys shelling out money and wanting a winner.

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:47:56 +0000

These types of trades are ridiculous. Superstar for superstar type trades don’t happen in the nfl. Its always superstar for draft picks. If anything, Boldin would be aquired with picks not a player.

By: Roy Taylor

Roy Taylor — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:54:05 +0000

Hm. As I was saying…

By: Dr Jean Carl Parisien

Dr Jean Carl Parisien — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:21:05 +0000

Dr Jean Carl Parisien says I like the idea of a Boldin for Urlacher deal. I could even see this happening. Arizona is ready to move Bolding and something reasonable should be able to be worked out