<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1995 Chicago Bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/index.php/chicago-bears-history/1995-chicago-bears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/index.php/chicago-bears-history/1995-chicago-bears/</link>
	<description>Chicago Bears Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:16:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/index.php/chicago-bears-history/1995-chicago-bears/#comment-13155</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/?p=146#comment-13155</guid>
		<description>Agreed-I don&#039;t know that they would have beaten Green Bay or Dallas in the playoffs that year.  But had they eeked into the playoffs they would have gone right to Green Bay, and despite Wanny&#039;s history with them it would have been awful hard for GB to beat the same team 3 times in a season.  See Vikings-Bears 1994.  The offense was absolutely Super Bowl-caliber, but did shut down in some key games (both Detroit games, Cincinnati).  They had a lot of opportunities to make the playoffs that year but didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed-I don&#8217;t know that they would have beaten Green Bay or Dallas in the playoffs that year.  But had they eeked into the playoffs they would have gone right to Green Bay, and despite Wanny&#8217;s history with them it would have been awful hard for GB to beat the same team 3 times in a season.  See Vikings-Bears 1994.  The offense was absolutely Super Bowl-caliber, but did shut down in some key games (both Detroit games, Cincinnati).  They had a lot of opportunities to make the playoffs that year but didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdm</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/index.php/chicago-bears-history/1995-chicago-bears/#comment-13151</link>
		<dc:creator>jdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagobearsweblog.com/blog/?p=146#comment-13151</guid>
		<description>The 1995 still pisses me off to this day.  That team should&#039;ve went 12-4.  With San Fran and Dallas not as strong as previous teams and Green Bay not quite the Super Bowl team yet, that was a perfect season to make a run.  I turned on Wanny for good after he cut Richard Dent.

&quot;Well, ahhh, we have Carl Simpson, Alzono Spellman, ahhh.  There is just too much depth for Richard.&quot;

Dent never even got a fair chance.  Good to know since the defense blew big time that year.  Dent went on to do more than any of those bums on the line in a limited role the next year with Indy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1995 still pisses me off to this day.  That team should&#8217;ve went 12-4.  With San Fran and Dallas not as strong as previous teams and Green Bay not quite the Super Bowl team yet, that was a perfect season to make a run.  I turned on Wanny for good after he cut Richard Dent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, ahhh, we have Carl Simpson, Alzono Spellman, ahhh.  There is just too much depth for Richard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dent never even got a fair chance.  Good to know since the defense blew big time that year.  Dent went on to do more than any of those bums on the line in a limited role the next year with Indy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
